Suchergebnisse

Résumé Ce travail vise à déchiffrer certaines bases socioculturelles à partir desquelles se construisent les rapports entre les deux personnages principaux du film Intouchables. Ainsi, cette fiction nous permettra de détecter des codes implicites qui définissent certaines subjectivités de la société française actuelle. En étudiant le croisement d'une sphère publique sur la sphère privée – et inversement –, nous verrons comment se construisent certains processus d'assimilation et la reproduction d'une culture spécifique. Ainsi, notre but consiste à démontrer que dans l'analyse de ces intersections cachées peuvent apparaître certaines potentialités critiques et politiques.

This work aims to understand certain socio-cultural elements through which the relationships between the two main characters of the French movie The intouchables are built. This fiction enables us to detect certain implicit codes that shape specific subjectivities in the French society. Focusing on how a public sphere intersects with a private one and – vice versa – we will see how some processes of assimilation and reproduction of a specific culture are built. At the same time, we aim to demonstrate that this analysis of those hidden intersections might be able to convey some critical and political potentialities. ; O artigo procura entender algumas das bases socioculturais que presidem a construção das relações entre os dois personagens principais do filme Os Intocáveis. Essa ficção nos permitirá identificar os códigos implícitos que definem certas subjetividades da sociedade francesa atual. Ao estudar o cruzamento da esfera pública com a privada, e inversamente, podemos ver como são construídos processos de assimialção e de reprodução de uma cultura específica. Assim, nosso objetivo consiste em mostrar como a análise dessas intersecções ocultas pode revelar algumas potencialidades críticas e políticas.

Resumen El concepto de dignidad humana entró recientemente en el Derecho de la Unión gracias en particular a la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea ("Carta"). Al mismo tiempo y en paralelo fue usada por el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) tanto para orientar algunas políticas públicas de los Estados miembros como para regular algunas libertades y derechos económicos de la Unión Europea. Nuestro estudio pretende mostrar cómo el concepto de dignidad humana se articula como un elemento de una biopolítica cuyo propósito consiste en gestionar y administrar ciertos aspectos de la vida humana y social.

[extract] Cet article se penche sur les nouvelles relations de pouvoir qui sont en train de prendre forme dans notre ère digitale. Il se base essentiellement sur un commentaire de l'ouvrage de Bernard E. Harcourt : Exposed. Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age. Notre objectif général cherche à démontrer que les sciences juridiques et politiques ont besoin d'adopter des instruments « critiques » contemporains si elles ne veulent tout simplement pas être absorbées par des intérêts politiques et économiques dont elles feindraient de connaître l'existence et l'étendue. Les ouvrages précédents de B. Harcourt portaient essentiellement sur les régimes contemporains de pénalités et il y disséquait les illusions qui permettaient à ces derniers de fonctionner : l'idée d'un ordre économique spontané, les méthodes actuarielles ou encore, le principe de tolérance zéro. Exposed s'intéresse à un registre différent dans la mesure où son objet d'analyse est notre ère numérique. Il existe cependant une certaine continuité, non seulement, comme nous le verrons, parce que l'auteur détecte de nouvelles logiques nourrissant mutuellement les sphères pénales et digitales, mais aussi et surtout, parce que l'auteur continue à déployer une méthodologie et une théorie critique visant à mieux saisir de nouvelles formes de pouvoir. Il faut donc comprendre Exposed comme un questionnement et un redéploiement créatif des outils d'une théorie critique contemporaine souhaitant détecter et résister à la circulation d'un nouveau type de pouvoir, qui va au-delà (voir en deçà) de la question de l'open government.

La laicidad representa un principio importante para la consolidación de un Estado de derecho y la ilustración de la ciudadanía. No obstante, a pesar y debido a su importancia, sufre constante ataques por parte de distintas fuerzas sociales y políticas. En este artículo, el autor identifica cuatro enemigos de la laicidad: el clericalismo, los fundamentalismos religiosos, el comunitarismo y el laicismo. El objetivo consiste no sólo en denunciar esos enemigos sino también en proporcionar argumentos contra sus ataques al principio de laicidad. ; Laicity (or secularism) embodies an important principle for the rule of law and the enlightenment of the citizenship. Nonetheless, and because of this relevance, different social and political forces constantly criticize it. In this article, the author identifies four enemies: clericalism, religious fundamentalisms, communitarianism, and laicism. The aim is not only to denounce those enemies but also to provide some arguments against their attacks to the principle of laicity. ; Este trabajo forma parte del proyecto "Professor Visitante do Exterior" (PVE) de la CAPES, en colaboración con la PUC-Rio (Pós-graduação em Direito / Núcleo de Direitos Humanos). Integra también el proyecto de investigación "Secularización, Laicidad y Libertad de Conciencia" -CSO2011-14850-E. El autor quiere agradecer el apoyo de la Fundación Gregorio Peces-Barba para el Estudio & Cooperación en Derechos Humanos.

Throughout his Adventures of Ideas, Whitehead defines the history of civilization as the progressive formation of the idea of human dignity, just like a "tiny glow announcing the dawn of a new life order"1. According to Patočka, the role of what he calls the "moderate supercivilization" consists in the creation of goods that can be universalized to all human beings. He insists particularly on two core values: scientific truth and human liberty. Both configure the "recognition of man by man as equal"2. Even if he does not talk explicitly about human dignity, Patočka refers to this notion as the central value of western civilization. Also, and from an historical perspective, Béjar thinks that the "greatest revolution of modernity is the affirmation of the individual as the deciding and unquestionable center of the collective organization"3. With these three preliminary references, it might be possible to think about the idea of human dignity. On one hand, this notion would be the mirror of a moral progress: social and political organizations would find their "raison d'être" in the respect of the value of human being. On the other hand, human dignity would match with a specific historical period (Modernity) and a particular civilization (the Western world). ; Programa Consolider "El tiempo de los derechos" (HURI-AGE)

Jo. Nic. Pele. Def. Frid. Christ. Iul. Hesse ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- 4 Diss. 788#Beibd.8

We argue, drawing on the work of Didier Fassin, that the right to health can be understood as an essential part of a radical politics of life. Since the right to health implies fostering the well-being of individuals in a way that is structural, progressive and non-discriminatory, the right not only problematises the 'governmentality' approach to power but allows push-back against statist and market discourses through a specific phenomenology of right. The discourse of rights – like the pandemic itself – oscillates between general and particular in a way that makes normative responses unstable. Nonetheless it is this dialectic that is characteristic of human rights discourse and allows a right to health to be the proper response to pandemic without it being subsumed within neoliberal logic. A politics of life is a multi-focussed analysis of life, health and society potentially resisting the appropriation of biological life by neoliberalism.

AbstractThe measurement of intangible resources, intellectual capital, has become a major area of investigation for researchers and practitioners, with increasing concerns for monitoring and valuating this type of capital. In spite of this, the approaches to these issues have not been harmonised, therefore management is currently experiencing real difficulties in the assessment and measurement of intangible resources. In this article we wanted to review the valuation of intangible resources from a theoretical point of view, by highlighting the features of the most important valuation methods established in the literature.

Abstract
In this article, models for assessing national intangible resources are analysed through a lecture in the literature, and the best-known evaluation methods are categorized into academic models and models of international organizations, with the most important differences being identified. The European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) and the World Economic Forum annual reports on Global Competitiveness were considered to assess Romania's position in the international context in terms of intangible assets. Despite the importance of intangible resources at national level and the fact that they are an important factor in determining economic growth in the current knowledge-based economy, this article concludes that Romania's position in the international context regarding intangible assets is very weak, with many weak points in research and innovation performance compared to other EU Member States. Therefore, there is a need in our country to re-evaluate the areas where all efforts need to be focused to stimulate innovation performance, to properly manage national intangible resources, a crucial process for improving the quality of life.